![]() Armadillo pteryx 00:22, 20 February 2021 (UTC) Reply For example, is Chi the surname of Kim Chi? Is Sport the last name of Jan Sport? Unless an RS can answer that, we default to using the full name. Otherwise, it's borderline WP:OR for us to decide whether multipart drag names contain surnames. As for treatment of surnames: I don't believe this is enshrined in policy, but typically use of the last name alone is only for exceptional cases, such as when the subject is on record stating that they treat the last name as a surname (or perhaps when the subject belongs to an established drag family that identifies by a surname (such as the O'Hara, Davenport and Andrews clans). ![]() And where the article discusses the subject's personal life or work out of drag, the legal name and corresponding pronouns should be used. Where the article discusses the subject's work in drag, the drag name and corresponding pronouns should be used. A couple GA-quality articles that could be used for reference are Honey Davenport and India Ferrah. Just to give my two cents, I think this article should keep its name and pronoun usage consistent with other drag queen articles, especially those also within the scope of WikiProject RuPaul's Drag Race.Another Believer ( Talk) 03:59, 18 February 2021 (UTC) Reply I would say the name usage for this article is very similar to the other drag queen articles which have been promoted to Good article status. Also, we should be sure to use the correct pronouns for Geggie and the female persona Gigi Goode. Similar to other drag queen articles, we should use 'Gigi Goode' throughout. Too many repetitions of "Geggie" and "Gigi Goode", stick to pronouns - only use last name when necessary, and change "Gigi Goode" to "Goode" in those cases per MOS:SURNAME.Kbabej ( talk) 23:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC) Reply Whole article Definitely willing to take any constructive criticism you feel will improve the article. This is my first GA co-nomination, and only second GA nomination overall, so I'm new to this process as well. Thanks! - Another Believer ( Talk) 02:32, 19 February 2021 (UTC) Reply Benmite: Hello! Thanks for reviewing. Please be patient as I am dealing with the February 11–14, 2021 North American storm complex aftermath. I've responded to some of your comments already and will continue to work on this. I've made a list of suggestions that I think could help improve the article, and I'm going to request a second opinion since this is my first GA Benmite: Thanks for reviewing. ![]() Okay, so, looking at the article, I see some things that might prevent it from being GA status, namely that there are some MOS violations and the article has information that seems out of scope or unnecessary to include. ![]() Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Another Believer ( Talk) 14:11, 12 February 2021 (UTC) Reply Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. This is my first GA review! Yay! ben ǝʇᴉɯ 08:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC) Reply Benmite, Thanks! - Another Believer ( Talk) 14:05, 12 February 2021 (UTC) Reply Putting this on User:Kbabej's radar as well as co-nominator.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |